Do You Really Need to Hold That Meeting [Quiz + Tips]
MeetingsDo You Really Need to Hold That Meeting
"This could have been an email."
Those six words can take the wind out of an office. They mean that time has been wasted, employees are frustrated, and leadership has been ever-so-slightly undermined.
Unjustified meetings are inefficient and grating. Haphazardly putting time on colleagues' calendars — only to fumble with its purpose, conduct it without direction, or spend all your time talking at attendees as opposed to collaborating with them — takes a toll on everyone involved.
Here, we'll review some criteria you should look for when deciding whether a meeting is worth everyone's time, see a few definitive signs that an issue doesn't warrant a meeting, and go over some of the more prominent, effective meeting alternatives.
When You Should Hold a Meeting
The issue at hand is urgent and time-sensitive.
If the information you need to convey is must-hear and timebound, don't think twice — book a meeting. You don't want to run the risk of sending a mass email about a pressing issue, only to have some employees gloss it over or ignore it entirely.
Some things are need-to-know and can't wait, and your response to those instances needs to reflect that kind of urgency. Don't be overly passive. Don't count on your team members to get to the information on their own time. Book a meeting, and get those points across.
You need a space for thorough discussion and multiple perspectives.
Some issues call for some...
/