What happened when 6.8m people were told real Monet art was AI
Marketing PsychologyWhat happened when 6.8m people were told real Monet art was AI
AI content is polarizing. When users spot that AI was used in art, backlash often follows. So, let’s run a quick experiment.
Take a look at the picture below. I just generated an image, in the style of a Monet painting, using AI. I used the latest AI models trained on the world’s best artwork. Have a look, and think about what makes this image inferior to a real Monet painting. Think about what you like and what you don’t like about it.
Source
Now, what if I told you that I lied? The image is a real Monet. A few weeks back, X user SHLOMS performed the same exercise. Let’s talk about what happened.
Table of Contents
The Post That Started It All
The “AI” Painting That Fooled Thousands
The Post That Started It All
Source
Over 1,300 people responded to SHLOMS’s post with resoundingly similar feedback. Almost everyone who replied said this AI art was pure crap.
They said it lacked “coherent composition.” The colors were an “incoherent muddle.” Some said it was “trying too hard.”
Others called the image “obvious AI slop.” They called it “garbage” and “borked nonsense with no sense of space.” Users picked holes in every aspect of the painting. They questioned its lack of meaning and how AI art simply lacks the magical quality imbued by human creativity.
But there’s a problem...
/